Brain Dump

Every sentient being finds a provisional identity through language constructs that address the concept of abstract, symbolic reasoning, which cannot simply be reduced to a series of definitional keywords, ad valorem. Social psychology addresses this on the level of community. Left to itself, consensus evolves, even if it is far from "true"; it hardens into pleonastic concept. Therefore, the study of language channels and grammar is the only "true" study -- despite the fact that no distinct Indo-European language is compatible, on the level of provisional lucidity, with another. Consequently, the social scientists involved in the investigation of empirical commonality do not think that the tendency to freely interpret can itself be interpreted in a way that leads to specific evidentiary conclusions about the status of linguistic memes, certainly not in isolation from phenomenological considerations. However, historians of linguistic evolution have concluded that the common forms of phonetic (vocal) and morphological exposition point toward strategies of implementation and change within the common language, though not necessarily within a linear project of transformation. Equivocation is, therefore, unavoidable. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.