Psychologically speaking, consciousness as conveyed linguistically is no longer pure consciousness, since it is impossible for subjective experiences to be objectively interpreted via symbols that function, mentally, as signs inscribed on the "blank slate" of synaptic phenomena. Consciousness, therefore, is ineffable and is experienced, by the isolated subject, as something transcendent but incommunicable. Any event that appears to take place in the world outside of an individual awareness will seem to embody the transcendent from the point of view of pure subjectivity, which can never know itself with absolute certainty.
The timeliness of all material existence transcends the functioning of the body, brain, and indeed, the mind of the knower, defined and experienced as an infinitely imploded but free-flowing point of cognition. Each mental object is perceived as an ideal system for closed-truths that must remain faithful to preconceived definitions if they are to be comprehended at all. On the other hand, any ideal system of possible psychical processes that are defined as truths will remain subject to potential cognitive epiphanies that may reconfigure the mental image, defined as the revelation of perception qua perception. Consequently, the unstable subject will "believe" himself to be engaged in "clear thinking", cogitating (and indeed, conjugating) all the essential moments of the absolutely immanent. How do you like them apples?
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
What's on your mind?